2 Lads Winery on the Old Mission Peninsula | Jane Boursaw Photo
2 Lads Winery | Jane Boursaw Photo
Feel free to share this post...

(Editor’s Note: Written by Grant Parsons, this letter was also sent to the Peninsula Township Board and read into the minutes of their July 12 meeting. -jb)

To the Peninsula Township Board:

The Wineries of Old Mission Peninsula (WOMP) sent what appears to be a threat to the Peninsula Township Board. The wineries say they will “determine whether to file against the township officials personally…” I am writing to express my continued support for you board members and to urge you to stand firm in the face of the wineries’ veiled threat.

I am also writing to express my personal outrage. The idea that the wineries may sue individual board members should outrage every township resident. The stress of being threatened with personal ruination, for simply performing your jobs, is an outrage to basic notions of democracy.

We township residents elected you to defend our agriculture zoning ordinance. The ordinance has been in effect for decades. These wineries have succeeded and thrived, courtesy of the Township’s agricultural land use plan. Past township boards have defended lawsuits challenging the ag ordinance. We had a successful referendum that rejected the type of commercialization of the agricultural zone proposed by wineries.

Our ag ordinance has created a unique, beautiful and thriving mixed community of rural and ag development. You, the board members, are doing nothing more than following the wishes of the majority of township voters. You are doing exactly what democracy requires you to do.

Opposing your principled defense of the Township’s land use plan, some self-interested, greedy commercial wineries are using a veiled threat to try to force you to surrender the rights of township residents by settling their unfair lawsuit. They want to force you to allow farms to turn into wedding event sites. The wineries may make statements about wanting to do nice things for our community, but their veiled threat belies WOMP’s true nature – greed and bullying.

The last time a commercial corporation tried to bully a local township official for defending local zoning, the bullying didn’t turn out well for the corporation. You may recall the lawsuit involving an Acme Township official who was threatened by a corporation. That man, Bill Boltres, exposed the Meijer Corporation in a counter suit. As reported in the Traverse City Record-Eagle, Boltres sued the corporation back, and won a settlement of approximately $2 million. Bill’s fellow township officials followed suit, made a similar claim against Meijer, and won large settlements.

The Old Mission wineries want to be seen as “nice guys,” but threats of personal lawsuits are not nice. A lawsuit against township officials in their personal capacity is called a “SLAPP suit” (Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation). It is a tactic used by unprincipled corporations to scare civic-minded officials into abandoning their zoning codes out of fear of personal financial ruin.

SLAPP suits damage democracy by undermining small communities’ rights and by deterring community members from serving in governmental office. SLAPP suits are antithetical to American democracy and American justice. SLAPP suits are simply big money trying to crush small town values.

You should ask your township attorney for advice. I believe he or she will explain the multiple safeguards that Michigan and United States laws provide to beat back SLAPP suits. I believe he or she will explain how you can defend yourself if the wineries follow through on their message. He or she may also advise you of your right to counter-sue for abuse of process, malicious prosecution, or infliction of emotional distress.

I want to express my sincere appreciation for your principled defense of Peninsula Township. Decades of innovative land use planning are on your side. The people of the township are on your side. The township’s history of agricultural zoning is on your side. The pending Protect the Peninsula (PTP) appeal is on your side. The future of Peninsula Township is on your side.

Please, keep up the good work. Do not fear bullies who make veiled threats.

-Grant Parsons

Also Read…

A NOTE FROM JANE: I started Old Mission Gazette in 2015 because I felt a calling to provide the Old Mission Peninsula community with local news. After decades of writing for newspapers and magazines like the New York Times, Los Angeles Times, Family Circle and Ladies' Home Journal, I really just wanted to write about my own community where I grew up on a cherry farm and raised my own family. So I started my own newspaper.

Because Old Mission Gazette is a "Reader Supported Newspaper" -- meaning it exists because of your financial support -- I hope you'll consider tossing a few bucks our way if I mention your event, your business, your organization or your news item, or if you simply love reading about what's happening on the OMP. In a time when local news is becoming a thing of the past, supporting an independent community newspaper is more important now than ever.

To keep the Gazette going, click here to make a donation. Thank you so much for your support. -jb

Bay View Insurance of Traverse City Michigan


  1. Thank you Grant for framing what is really going on regarding WOMP (“Wrecking” Old Mission Peninsula).

    I also express my immense appreciation to our township board and staff.

    I have always supported expanding agricultural pursuits on the peninsula but what the Wineries are doing is an attempt to create expanded commercial zones for themselves. They have come to expect preferential treatment and are willing to turn their back on their neighbors, soak the township for two hundred million dollars and bully our elected representatives. While the township has formed an agricultural committee to pursue a more balanced approach to expanding agricultural opportunities for all farmers, the wineries refuse to participate and threaten the township board with SLAP lawsuits instead. The wineries I used to frequent I thought of as friends and neighbors…now they are simply litigants.

    Hope this all has a more congenial and agreeable resolution soon,

    Todd Wilson

    • Todd, Thanks so much for expressing those thoughts. I feel so badly for the township board and, like you, I am hoping for a more neighborly future. Grant

  2. I am outraged by WOMP threatening our township officials with personal lawsuits. Thank you, Grant, for bringing this out in the open and explaining the SLAPP suits. This is wrong on so many levels. It is tragic that the wineries decided to file a lawsuit in the beginning, rather than being patient and working through a process to find a solution that would work for everyone. Conflict resolution takes time and being willing to sit down with all parties and work out an agreement. In the end, a solution is found that everyone can be part of, that everyone can be proud of, and everyone can own. Lawsuits are costly and polarize people. This conflict is not good for OMP’s reputation and pits people against each other. Ultimately, everyone suffers. There is a better way. Thank you to the Township Board and to all who are trying to resolve this conflict.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here
Please enter an e-mail address

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.