(Editor’s Note: Kelly Clark, candidate for Township Supervisor, responds to Susie Shipman’s opinion piece published here. Read on for his thoughts. -jb)
Old Mission Gazette is Reader Supported.
Click Here to Keep the Gazette Going.
Everyone is a villain in someone else’s story.
In her recent opinion piece, Susie Shipman calls my character into question. Odd, since she also states she doesn’t know me and I do not know her. I’m not surprised though, since she currently serves on the Township Planning Commission with my opponent, and their first response is always adversarial. This is exactly what our residents are tired of.
She first questioned my honesty when I stated that I was instrumental in keeping OMPS in the community. Go back and watch the TCAPS archives. Without speaking up on behalf of the school and the group we had been working with, the school would have gone to the highest bidder, who would have used the school for another purpose. I also sent my son Cooper there for third grade to try and boost their numbers, but he was accepted into the TAG program at Central Grade and left after one year.
I never said I was integral in running or starting the school. I wasn’t trying to take the credit. I am simply happy to have been a small part of it and happy to see that it is still operating.
I have been working with my accountant for a long time now to establish Lakefront Love as a non-profit entity. We are awaiting IRS approval and see no reason why it will not be recognized as a non-profit in the coming weeks.
The mission of Lakefront Love is to protect and preserve the Great Lakes through funding for research, environmental cleanup, and financial contributions to candidates who support environmental concerns directly impacting the Great Lakes and watershed initiatives. I appreciate Susie’s due diligence, and I’m sorry our timeline does not meet with Susie’s approval. We will succeed regardless.
As for my “celebration of disobedience,” I encourage all residents to ask why they are required to pay permit fees for fences, deer blinds, hoop houses and docks on property that they already own and pay taxes on. With so many regulations in place, it’s likely everyone reading this is “disobedient” in some form or another. Wait until you speak out at a meeting, only to receive a notice a few days later, telling you the items that better be fixed on your property, lest you face more fines.
Michigan is one of a handful of states that has all three major taxes; income, property and sales tax. Eight states are looking to add ballot initiatives limiting or banning property taxes. My opponent wants to raise them for our township. When will my opponents figure out that you can’t tax people into prosperity?
Perhaps Susie misunderstood what was written in regard to offering to serve on the shoreline committee. I personally did not have a problem with the time of day. My point was that other constituents would have a hard time, since many people work 9 to 5. I offered multiple times to serve and was told no. Jenn Cram does not want constituents with different viewpoints on the committee. She does not want constituents who say no to more permits and fees.
I’m glad Susie has enjoyed her time with Jenn. She seems to be in the minority. I listened to Jenn read the zoning language for building height. It was straightforward. She then said, “That’s not how I interpret it.” If she wants it changed, then go through the correct process. Until then, the language is what we go by.
The biggest issue I have with Jenn is trust. There are multiple instances where she will tell constituents she is in support, only to go before the board and completely blind-side them. I wonder why the people hired to work directly with Jenn only lasted a couple of months or, in one case, a couple of days.
I was a master level. bilingual public educator for 25 years and served on the board of education for TCAPS, yet my opponents try to label me as anti-education and anti-public libraries. I was a Grand Traverse County Sheriff Deputy and licensed Coast Guard Captain, yet my opponents try to label me as anti-first responders. The easy route would be to keep trying to raise taxes, but I prefer to ask questions to try to find alternative solutions that will take the burden off of taxpayers.
If you want the same divisiveness and litigation issues, without creative thoughts or solutions, vote for Maura Sanders. While it will not be on the ballot this year, what will happen if the AxMItax initiative passes in the future and she has no plan B in place? As a reminder, Democrats are allowed to vote in Republican primaries in Michigan. That is what Maura is counting on and those are her supporters. Need proof? The signs are there…
I am rarely on Nextdoor. Unlike our current supervisor and his protege, who apparently scour the site like Captain Queeq searching for the strawberries, I prefer to spend my time more productively. It would be nice if they responded as quickly to official emails as they do to social media. That being said, the first thing I ever wrote to Maura on Nextdoor was “Thank you for offering to serve our township.” I have received nothing but slings and arrows since then, despite her also saying that she agreed with me on many issues.
Maura states that she will step down from her real estate career to serve as Supervisor. As Susie would say, “that is quite a stretch” from someone who, according to our MLS data, has sold two houses in the past four years, during what has been the most lucrative period in the history of Traverse City real estate. If my opponent is not willing to get up and grind for herself, what makes you think she will get up and grind for our community?
For the record, Fred Swaffer, Kate Jerman, J.P. Milliken and Mark Luea are all remarkable, intelligent, capable professionals, with their own individual thoughts who are informed and concerned with the issues facing our township.
We do share some common vision. We believe in protecting our community while allowing it to flourish. We believe in not raising taxes. If elected, I would be honored to serve with them in representing our community.
Also Read…
SUPPORT YOUR INDEPENDENT LOCAL NEWSPAPER: I started Old Mission Gazette in 2015 because I felt a calling to provide the Old Mission Peninsula community with local news. After decades of writing for newspapers and magazines like the New York Times, Los Angeles Times, Family Circle and Ladies' Home Journal, I really just wanted to write about my own community where I grew up on a cherry farm and raised my own family. So I started my own newspaper.
Because Old Mission Gazette is a "Reader Supported Newspaper" -- meaning it exists because of your financial support -- I hope you'll consider tossing a few bucks our way if I mention your event, your business, your organization or your news item, or if you simply love reading about what's happening on the OMP. In a time when local news is becoming a thing of the past, supporting an independent community newspaper is more important now than ever. Thank you so much for your support! -Jane Boursaw, Editor/Publisher, Old Mission Gazette
To keep the Gazette going, click here to make a donation.
Hi Kelly,
Unfortunately, you are providing substantial misinformation. I am actually wondering if you have Maura Sanders confused with somebody else.
Regarding real estate, unfortunately you are not performing your due diligence and therefore limiting your knowledge. Not sure if you are aware that your Michigan real estate license is applicable anywhere in the state. My network is significant across Michigan and all corners of the United States. I am also very conscious of the fact that I don’t have the qualifications to ethically represent clients in commercial and industrial sales and leases. Therefore, those heavy lifts are referred out. A little bit of searching at the State level and even asking me would have been helpful for your awareness. Just for your awareness, my business is rather successful and my staff are well compensated. They are also well trained and they will be able to take command without issue. Assumptions are not good business. “Grind”… Again, you are showing the inability to perform due diligence. This is a very rigid and ungenerous perspective.
I am not on the Planning Commission with Susie Shipman.
I have never once said that I will be raising taxes or that I plan to raise taxes. Please correct me if I am wrong. I have repeatedly said that I believe in due diligence and that the power rests with the will of the people and their vote. I have repeatedly said that I am against Charter Township and I am the Trustee that made the motion to NOT move forward with Headlee. Please refer to meeting minutes.
Why would I say that you are anti-education, anti-public libraries or anti-first responders? Are you sure that you are referencing your opponent, Maura Sanders, me? Interesting points to pull out of the air. Disingenuous at the foundation.
Sadly, the only times I have responded on Next Door and The Old Mission Gazette were to provide you the information that you were missing; meeting minutes, Michigan.gov links, etc. All very informative and supportive information.
Lead from the front and lead with the truth.
Regards, Maura Sanders
Check out Maura (Duggan) Sanders’ profile on LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/in/mauraasanders
Mr. Clark, your response reflects your poor comprehension of Susie’s editorial. Your two sentences contradict each other:
“Without speaking up on behalf of the school and the group we had been working with, the school would have gone to the highest bidder, who would have used the school for another purpose.”
“I never said I was integral in running or starting the school. I wasn’t trying to take the credit.”
Surely, you see the contradiction laid bare?
“Jenn Cram does not want constituents with different viewpoints on the committee. She does not want constituents who say no to more permits and fees.”
Kelly, did she say that, or I are you surmising? Because it’s stated as fact, it sounds like you know this rather than guess it.
My experience with Jenn has been different, that she has bent over backwards to include people who represent all viewpoints on a subject, even to the point of proactively inviting people if a constituency doesn’t come forward to volunteer.